Still Life Paintings Artists Index
Aelst, Willem van 1627-c.1683
Angermayer, Johann Adalbert 1674-1740
Arcimboldo, Giuseppe 1527-1593
Ast, Balthasar van der 1594-1657
Baschenis, Evaristo 1617-1677
Baugin, Lubin c.1610-1663
Beert, Osias c.1580-1624
Beyeren, Abraham Hendrickz van c.1620-1690
Boel, Pieter 1622-1674
Bosschaert, Johannes c.1610-c.1650
Bosschaert, Jean Baptiste 1667-1746
Bosschaert the Elder, Ambrosius 1573-1621
Byss, Johann Rudolf 1660-1738
Cezanne, Paul 1839-1906
Claesz, Pieter c.1597-1660
Craen, Laurens 1612-1666
d'Hondecoeter, Melchior 1636-1695
Dael, Jan Frans van 1764-1840
Es, Jacob Fopsen van 1596-1666
Faes, Pieter 1750-1814
Fantin-Latour, Henri 1836-1904
Flegel, Georg 1566-1638
Heade, Martin Johnson 1819-1904
Heda, Willem Claesz 1594-1680
Heem, Jan Davidsz de c.1600-c.1683
Heem, Cornelis de 1631-1695
Huysum, Jan van 1682-1749
Kalf, Willem 1619-1693
Lacroix, Paul 1827-1869
Ladell, Edward 1821-1886
Mignon, Abraham 1640-1679
Os, Georgius Jacobus Johannes van 1782-1861
Redon, Odilon 1840-1916
Roepel, Coenraet 1678-1748
Ruysch, Rachel 1664-1750
Schrieck, Otto Marseus van c.1619/20-1678
Snyders, Frans 1579-1657
Spaendonck, Cornelis van 1756-1840
Spelt, Adrian van der c.1630-1673
Utrecht, Adriaen van 1599-1652
Vallayer-Coster, Anne 1744-1818
Wedig, Gottfried von c.1583-1641
Weenix, Jan 1640-1719
Weenix, Jan Baptist 1621-1660
Willeboirts Bosschaert, Thomas 1614-1654
Wyant, Alexander Helwig 1836-1892
Still-Life - Art History of the Genre
Still life is a work of art which represents a subject composed of inanimate objects. Popular in Western art since the 17th century, still life paintings, such as of flowers or fruit, give the artist more leeway in the arrangement of design elements within a composition than do paintings of other types of subjects such as landscape or portraiture.
Still life paintings often adorn the walls of ancient Egyptian tombs. It was believed that the foodstuffs and other items depicted there would, in the afterlife, become real and available for use by the deceased. Similar paintings, more simply decorative in intent, have also been found in the Roman frescoes unearthed at Pompeii and Herculaneum. The popular appreciation of still life painting as a demonstration of the artist's skill is related in the ancient Greek legend of Zeuxis and Parrhasius.
Through the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, still life in Western art was mainly used as an adjunct to Christian religious subjects. This was particularly true in the work of Northern European artists, whose fascination with highly detailed optical realism and disguised symbolism led them to lavish great attention on the meanings of various props and settings within their paintings' overall message. Painters such as Jan van Eyck often used still life elements as part of an iconographic program so dense that scholars to this day are still debating the possible symbolic significance of each flower, candle, or stone.
Still life came into its own in the new artistic climate of the Netherlands in the 17th century. While artists found limited opportunity to produce the religious art which had long been their staple (images of religious subjects were forbidden in the Dutch Reformed Protestant Church), the continuing Northern tradition of detailed realism and hidden symbols appealed to the growing Dutch middle classes, who were replacing Church and State as the principal patrons of art in the Netherlands.
Especially popular in this period were vanitas paintings, in which sumptuous arrangements of fruit and flowers, or lavish banquet tables with fine silver and crystal, were accompanied by symbolic reminders of life's impermanence. A skull, an hourglass or pocket watch, a candle burning down or a book with pages turning, would serve as a moralizing message on the ephemerality of sensory pleasures. Often some of the luscious fruits and flowers themselves would be shown starting to spoil or fade. The popularity of vanitas paintings, and of still life generally, soon spread from Holland to Flanders, Spain, and France.
The French aristocracy of the 18th century also employed artists to execute paintings of bounteous and extravagant still life subjects, this time without the moralistic vanitas message of their Dutch predecessors. The Rococo love of artifice led to a rise in appreciation for trompe l'oeil (French: "fool the eye") painting, a type of still life in which objects are shown life-sized, against a flat background, in an attempt to create the illusion of real three dimensional objects in the viewer's space.
With the rise of the European Academies, most notably the Academie francaise which held a central role in Academic art, and their formalized approach to artistic training, still life began to fall from favor. The Academies taught the doctrine of "Hierarchy of genres" (or "Hierarchy of Subject Matter"), which held that a painting's artistic merit was based primarily on its subject. In the Academic system, the highest form of painting consisted of images of historical, Biblical or mythological significance, with still life subjects relegated to the very lowest order of artistic recognition.
It was not until the decline of the Academic hierarchy in Europe, and the rise of the Impressionist and Post-Impressionist painters, who emphasized technique and design over subject matter, that still life was once again avidly practiced by artists. Henri Fantin-Latour is known almost exclusively for his still lifes. Vincent van Gogh's "Sunflowers" are some of the best known 19th century still life paintings, and Paul Cezanne found in still life the perfect vehicle for his revolutionary explorations in geometric spatial organization.
Indeed, Cezanne's experiments can be seen as leading directly to the development of Cubist still life in the early 20th century. Between 1910 and 1920, Cubist artists like Pablo Picasso, Georges Braque, and Juan Gris painted many still life compositions, often including musical instruments, as well as creating the first Synthetic Cubist collage works, such as Picasso's "Still Life with Chair Caning" (1912).
Artists in the United States, largely unburdened by Academic strictures on subject matter, had long found a ready market for still life painting. Raphaelle Peale (1774-1825), eldest son of Revolutionary era painter Charles Willson Peale, was the first American still life specialist, and established a tradition of still life painting in Philadelphia that continued until the early 20th century, when artists such as William Harnett and John Frederick Peto gained fame for their trompe l'oeil renderings of collections of worn objects and scraps of paper, typically shown hanging on a wall or door.
When 20th century American artists became aware of European Modernism, they began to interpret still life subjects with a combination of American Realism and Cubist-derived abstraction. Typical of the American still life works of this period are the paintings of Georgia O'Keeffe, Stuart Davis, and Marsden Hartley, and the photographs of Edward Weston.
Much Pop Art (such as Andy Warhol's "Campbell's Soup Cans") is based on still life, but its true subject is most often the commodified image of the commercial product represented rather than the physical still life object itself. The rise of Photorealism in the 1970s reasserted illusionistic representation, while retaining some of Pop's message of the fusion of object, image, and commercial product. Typical in this regard are the paintings of Don Eddy and Ralph Goings. The works of Audrey Flack add to this mix an autobiographical Feminist message relating to cultural standards of female beauty. While they address contemporary themes, Flack's paintings often include trompe l'oeil and vanitas elements as well, thereby referencing the entire still life tradition of Western art.